LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

CORNET v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter for reneging on the promise that laid off employees would get the same severance that had previously been offered (at least 2 months base pay, bonuses, 3 months equity vesting, and health care contributions). 

​

BORGHINO v. TWITTER -   This California state court case challenges Twitter for reneging on its promise regarding severance for California employees.

ADLER v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s failure to provide 60 days’ advance notice to many terminated employees.

​

RODRIGUEZ v. TWITTER –  This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through PRO Unlimited.

​

GADALA v. TWITTER - This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through TEKsystems.

STRIFLING v. TWITTER -  This case is a sex discrimination case.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted female employees at a much higher rate than male employees.

​

BORODAENKO v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s discrimination against disabled employees.

​

ZEMAN v. TWITTER - This case is an age discrimination case.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted employees age 50 and over at a higher rate than younger employees. 

​

WEINBERG v. TWITTER - This case includes claims of sex, race, and age discrimination, as well as class claims under the FMLA.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoffs for having impacted protected groups at a much higher rate than other employees.  This case includes a class claim that employees who were taking family or medical leave, or were preparing to do so, were impacted particularly by the layoffs.

​

FREDERICK-OSBORN v. TWITTER - This case includes claims of sex and age discrimination, challenging Twitter's constructive layoff of female and older workers following the company's initial layoffs after Musk's acquisition of the company, including through the ultimatum given to employees on November 17, 2022. 

WHITE COAT CAPTIONING, LLC v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s refusal to pay overdue invoices to vendors.